I was browsing through some of my favorite left-wing sites and ran across a post on DemocraticUnderground.com about Donal Rumsfeld's remarks to the American Legion earlier today.
They are getting upset about him comparing those who supported appeasing Adolf Hitler in the lead up to World War II to those who criticize the current policies in Iraq.
It seems the moonbats over there don't like being called Nazis, and are all up in arms about such a comparison. This is where the moonbats get seriously hypocritical. Ever since the start of the War on Terrorism they have been calling Bush the new Hitler and using photoshopped images of Bush in Hitlers uniform in their protests. But when someone turns the table on them and calls them Nazi appeasers they go completely nuts and claim foul!
"Addressing several thousand veterans at the American Legion's national convention, Rumsfeld recited what he called the lessons of history, including the failed efforts to appease the Adolf Hitler regime in the 1930s.
'I recount this history because once again we face the same kind of challenges in efforts to confront the rising threat of a new type of fascism' he said." - CNN Article
So I guess this is the new rule. It's ok to call Bush the new Hitler. It is not ok to call the moonbats appeasers to the fascists.
Do these people even read their own writings?!
Tags: Democrat, Democratic Underground, Donald Rumsfeld, Iraq, Middle East, Moonbats, Netroots, Politics, Republican, September 11, Terrorism, United States, War